Budget — Federal
Federal Spending Target of 21% of GDP Is Inappropriate Benchmark
Some have suggested that the President’s Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform should target spending at no more than 21 percent of GDP, the historical average of the last four decades.
Such recommendations, however, fail to take account of fundamental changes in society and government — the aging of the population, substantial increases in health care costs, and new federal responsibilities in areas such as homeland security, education, and prescription drug coverage for seniors. These factors make the expenditure levels of several decades ago inapplicable today.
Targeting federal expenditures at their average level for decades back to 1970 risks draconian cuts in Social Security, Medicare, and an array of other vital federal activities.
Causes of Today’s Large Deficits
“Some critics continue to assert that President George W. Bush’s policies bear little responsibility for the deficits the nation faces over the coming decade — that, instead, the new policies of President Barack Obama and the 111th Congress are to blame. Most recently, a Heritage Foundation paper downplayed the role of Bush-era policies…. Nevertheless, the fact remains: Together with the economic downturn, the Bush tax cuts and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq explain virtually the entire deficit over the next ten years.”
Basics
The federal budget outlines the U.S. government’s spending plans for the coming fiscal year and how it plans to pay for that spending. The three biggest areas of federal spending in 2007 were defense and security, Social Security, and public health insurance programs, each of which made up roughly one-fifth of the budget. About 75 percent of the money used to pay for these programs came from individuals, through income and payroll taxes. Most of the rest came from business owners, though 6 percent came from borrowing.
Policy Basics:
- Where Do Our Tax Dollars Go?
- Introduction to the Federal Budget Process
- Deficits, Debt, and Interest
- Congress's "Pay-As-You-Go" Budget Rule
Featured Experts
The Center informs the debate over federal budget priorities by analyzing the President’s budget and major congressional proposals throughout the annual budget process. We pay particular attention to the adequacy of funding for programs that assist low- and moderate-income families. We also analyze long-term budget challenges and measures to address them. In addition, we promote measures to improve fiscal responsibility.
New
-
Off the Charts Blog Post: In Case You Missed It…
September 3, 2010
-
Podcast: Upcoming Debate on Middle-Class and High-Income Tax Cuts
August 31, 2010
-
2010 Medicare Trustees’ Report Shows Benefits of Health Reform and Need for Its Successful Implementation
August 16, 2010
-
What the 2010 Trustees’ Report Shows about Social Security
August 13, 2010
-
Extension of High-Income Tax Cuts Would Benefit Few Small Businesses; Jobs Tax Credit Would Be Better
August 3, 2010
- More:
- View All By Date
Of Interest
Video: Video Highlights from the Peter Peterson Foundation Event on Budget and Deficits
Video: Highlights from the Conference "Progressives and the National Debt: Consequences and Solutions"
Robert Greenstein Discusses the President's Budget on Washington Journal
Washington Post Op-Ed: Robert Greenstein and James Horney on Budget "Reconciliation"
Video: Greenstein Debates the Budget Plan on the Newshour with Jim Lehrer
By the Numbers







